ABSTRACT
[Objective]To motivate acupuncture school teachers to introduce higher-quality methodology in clinical acupuncture research.<BR>[Methods]Twenty-eight teachers from 18 acupuncture schools participated in the simulated randomized, subject and evaluator-blinded, and sham-controlled trial of acupuncture for low back pain. Twenty of them played a role as subjects, four of them were raters, and another four were therapists. Before and after conducting the trial, all the participants were asked several questions using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) regarding necessity of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) in acupuncture and their level of understanding of several terms related to a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT),<BR>[Results]After the simulated RCT, the understanding level of all terms related to RCT increased significantly ("RCT":from 58.0 ± 27.2 to 75.5 ± 25.7, "informed consent":from 88.1 ± 15.4 to 99.2 ± 10, "recruitment":from 43.0 ± 41.0 to 74.8 ± 31.3, "random allocation":from 55.5 ± 35.0 to 78.7 ± 25.8, "masking":from 54.7 ± 35.0 to 79.0 ± 26.0) (mean ±SD). Nineteen teachers answered that they would try to conduct RCT and introduce it to their education program.<BR>[Conclusion]The results suggest that the practice of simulated RCT is effective in understanding RCT and motivating acupuncture teachers to introduce it to their education program.